PNEUS que o pessoal usa
Actualizando o meu post anterior de dezembro de 2009.
Após os Primacy e os Excellence, os Dunlop SP SPORT 01 chegaram ao fim...
Não foram horriveis, nunca senti falta de segurança, mas adornavam muito em curva, sentia o carro "solto" a velocidades que já dão multas jeitosas.
Estavam acima do taco, mas já se estavam a começar a desfazer, e está aí o Inverno.
Foram inferiores em tudo aos anteriores goodyear excellence... e duraram menos 10 mil kms.
(Concordo em absoluto o que o King escreveu em 2009)
Notas finais (0-20)
Aderência em seco: 14
Aderência em molhado: 15
Durabilidade: 13
Consumo: 15
Barulho rolamento: 15
(Neutros, não eram silenciosos, nem barulhentos)
Comentários:
Não são horriveis, são de uma gama média/superior.
Voltaria a comprar:
Acho que não... consideraria apenas pelo preço numa eventual promoção que possa existir.
Pneus montados:
Voltei aos 205/55 R16 - Michelin Primacy HP com índice W.
Montados no sábado já fizeram 400 kms. É uma diferença no comportamento para melhor, bastante significativa.
Pela primeira vez enchi com nitrogénio... vamos ver como se portam.
Last edited:
encheste com nitrogénio ou azoto??
Não sou perito... mas acho que é a mesma coisa porque têm o mesmo simbolo na tabela periodica
penso eu de que.
Testes da ADAC de Março 2011 para 205 55 R16 W
-A principais surpresas para mim:
Nokian Z G2 -> Em terceito lugar!
Mabor Sport-Jet 2 -> Não recomendado!
205 55 R16 W summer tyres test • Oponeo.co.uk
In this article we present the official results for size 205 55 R16 test by the German Automobile Club ADAC and Warentest foundation of summer tyres. We clearly present all advantages and disadvantages of 205 55 R16 W tested tyres.
If your car can drive faster than 240 km/h, you will need a W index tyre (up to 270 km/h) or higher, if only to avoid problems with the police or your insurance company. It does not matter that you don't drive as fast, the car still needs tyres to match its performance.
In the 2009 205 55 R16 W (up to 270 km/h) summer tyre test conducted by the German car club ADAC and the Warentest Foundation (German Stiftung Warentest), Michelin Primacy HP turned out to be the best. It is worth pointing out that while Michelin products ranked lower in previous tests due to the company’s focus on lowering the rolling resistance (and fuel consumption) at a price of reducing wet surface performance and braking distance, Primacy HP seems to be a successful compromise.
Five other products have also won the “highly recommended” rating. These are Continental PremiumContact 2, Nokian Z G2, Bridgestone Turanza ER300 and Firestone TR300 alpha. Due to its lower speed index, Goodyear OptiGrip, was ranked separately. Another 6 models were considered “recommended”: Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response, Maloya Futura Sport W, Uniroyal RainSport 2, Fulda Carat Exelero, Semperit Speed-Life and Kumho Ecsta HM KH31.
Note!
In ADAC tests, lower scores means better results. The tyres with the lowest scores are the most recommended by ADAC.
Unfortunately, as many as 5 out of 16 W-index products turned out to be poor. Three were ranked as “conditionally recommended”: Hankook Venrus PrimeK105, Matador MP 46 Ultra Sport Hectorra 2 and Avon AV5, while two other were “not recommended”: Mabor Sport-Jet 2 i Syron Race 1. These low ratings were usually caused by poor wet performance. As shown in the following table, two products have already been changed, so the available version with the DOT number given in the table or later can have slightly different characteristics.
Once again, it can be assumed that price does not mean quality. When buying tyres, you should also remember that price varies depending on where you buy them – both in Germany and in Poland. Unfortunately, almost 1/3 of the tyres are insufficiently good. On the other hand, it is encouraging that the leading models are not significantly more costly than the worst ones.
1) Michelin Primacy HP
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
lowest tread wear
especially good on dry surfaces
cons:
(none)
2) Continental PremiumContact 2
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
one of the two best tyres on dry road
also good on wet surfaces
cons:
slightly increased fuel consumption
3) Nokian Z G2
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
good on dry and wet road surfaces
cons:
slightly increased fuel consumption
4) Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
one of the two best tyres on dry road
cons:
(none)
5) Firestone TZ300 alpha
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
good wet surface performance
cons:
(none)
6) Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
Pros:
good on dry road
low tread wear
cons: slightly lower performance on wet surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
7) Maloya Futura Sport W
Pros:
especially good on wet surfaces
cons:
small weaknesses on dry road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
the noisiest (outside)
8) Uniroyal RainSport 2
Pros:
good on dry and wet road surfaces
cons:
tread wear (lowered ADAC recommendation)
9) Fulda Carat Exelero
Pros:
very good wet surface performance
cons:
relatively high fuel consumption (lowered ADAC recommendation)
10) Semperit Speed-life
Pros:
(none)
cons:
slightly lower performance on wet surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
11) Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
Pros:
(none)
cons:
slightly lower dry surface performance
high tread wear
the accelerated total wear test only passed according to DIN standard
12) Hankook Ventus Prime K105
Pros:
good on dry road surfaces
low tread wear
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
13) Matador MP 46 Ultra Sport Hectorra 2
Pros:
(none)
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
high tread wear
14) Avon ZV5 (according to the manufacturer changed from DOT 0409)
Pros:
lowest fuel consumption
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
slightly higher tread wear
the accelerated total wear test only passed according to DIN standard
15) Mabor Sport-Jet 2 (according to the manufacturer changed from DOT 0809)
Pros:
the least noisy of all tested
cons:
poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
poor on dry road surfaces
slightly higher tread wear
16) Syron Race 1
Pros:
(none)
cons:
poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
poor on dry road surfaces
slightly higher tread wear
-A principais surpresas para mim:
Nokian Z G2 -> Em terceito lugar!
Mabor Sport-Jet 2 -> Não recomendado!
205 55 R16 W summer tyres test • Oponeo.co.uk
In this article we present the official results for size 205 55 R16 test by the German Automobile Club ADAC and Warentest foundation of summer tyres. We clearly present all advantages and disadvantages of 205 55 R16 W tested tyres.
If your car can drive faster than 240 km/h, you will need a W index tyre (up to 270 km/h) or higher, if only to avoid problems with the police or your insurance company. It does not matter that you don't drive as fast, the car still needs tyres to match its performance.
In the 2009 205 55 R16 W (up to 270 km/h) summer tyre test conducted by the German car club ADAC and the Warentest Foundation (German Stiftung Warentest), Michelin Primacy HP turned out to be the best. It is worth pointing out that while Michelin products ranked lower in previous tests due to the company’s focus on lowering the rolling resistance (and fuel consumption) at a price of reducing wet surface performance and braking distance, Primacy HP seems to be a successful compromise.
Five other products have also won the “highly recommended” rating. These are Continental PremiumContact 2, Nokian Z G2, Bridgestone Turanza ER300 and Firestone TR300 alpha. Due to its lower speed index, Goodyear OptiGrip, was ranked separately. Another 6 models were considered “recommended”: Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response, Maloya Futura Sport W, Uniroyal RainSport 2, Fulda Carat Exelero, Semperit Speed-Life and Kumho Ecsta HM KH31.
Note!
In ADAC tests, lower scores means better results. The tyres with the lowest scores are the most recommended by ADAC.
Unfortunately, as many as 5 out of 16 W-index products turned out to be poor. Three were ranked as “conditionally recommended”: Hankook Venrus PrimeK105, Matador MP 46 Ultra Sport Hectorra 2 and Avon AV5, while two other were “not recommended”: Mabor Sport-Jet 2 i Syron Race 1. These low ratings were usually caused by poor wet performance. As shown in the following table, two products have already been changed, so the available version with the DOT number given in the table or later can have slightly different characteristics.
Once again, it can be assumed that price does not mean quality. When buying tyres, you should also remember that price varies depending on where you buy them – both in Germany and in Poland. Unfortunately, almost 1/3 of the tyres are insufficiently good. On the other hand, it is encouraging that the leading models are not significantly more costly than the worst ones.
1) Michelin Primacy HP
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
lowest tread wear
especially good on dry surfaces
cons:
(none)
2) Continental PremiumContact 2
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
one of the two best tyres on dry road
also good on wet surfaces
cons:
slightly increased fuel consumption
3) Nokian Z G2
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
good on dry and wet road surfaces
cons:
slightly increased fuel consumption
4) Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
one of the two best tyres on dry road
cons:
(none)
5) Firestone TZ300 alpha
Pros:
a versatile summer tyre
good wet surface performance
cons:
(none)
6) Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
Pros:
good on dry road
low tread wear
cons: slightly lower performance on wet surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
7) Maloya Futura Sport W
Pros:
especially good on wet surfaces
cons:
small weaknesses on dry road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
the noisiest (outside)
8) Uniroyal RainSport 2
Pros:
good on dry and wet road surfaces
cons:
tread wear (lowered ADAC recommendation)
9) Fulda Carat Exelero
Pros:
very good wet surface performance
cons:
relatively high fuel consumption (lowered ADAC recommendation)
10) Semperit Speed-life
Pros:
(none)
cons:
slightly lower performance on wet surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
11) Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
Pros:
(none)
cons:
slightly lower dry surface performance
high tread wear
the accelerated total wear test only passed according to DIN standard
12) Hankook Ventus Prime K105
Pros:
good on dry road surfaces
low tread wear
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
13) Matador MP 46 Ultra Sport Hectorra 2
Pros:
(none)
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
high tread wear
14) Avon ZV5 (according to the manufacturer changed from DOT 0409)
Pros:
lowest fuel consumption
cons:
relatively poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
slightly higher tread wear
the accelerated total wear test only passed according to DIN standard
15) Mabor Sport-Jet 2 (according to the manufacturer changed from DOT 0809)
Pros:
the least noisy of all tested
cons:
poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
poor on dry road surfaces
slightly higher tread wear
16) Syron Race 1
Pros:
(none)
cons:
poor on wet road surfaces (lowered ADAC recommendation)
poor on dry road surfaces
slightly higher tread wear
E caro...
Do que li dos testes, o pilot sport 3 dura bastante mais que as versões anteriores.
HIGH PERFORMER HS-3
Do melhor., Tão depressa não quero outra marca. Tanto em molhado como em seco, com altas temperaturas ou baixas, agarra sempre bem, sem grandes barulhos de rolamento. Depois de os montar já fizeram aproximadamente 6000 klm e bem puxados tanto em seco como em chuva. Por 280€ mais montagem, 4 pneus 225/40 R18, não podia estar mais satisfeito
Do melhor., Tão depressa não quero outra marca. Tanto em molhado como em seco, com altas temperaturas ou baixas, agarra sempre bem, sem grandes barulhos de rolamento. Depois de os montar já fizeram aproximadamente 6000 klm e bem puxados tanto em seco como em chuva. Por 280€ mais montagem, 4 pneus 225/40 R18, não podia estar mais satisfeito
Boas,
Em Fevereiro de 2010 coloquei 4 Michelin Primacy HP 2 duraram cerca de 35 000 km 2 ainda estão para durar (esqueci de cruzar, lol)
Seja seco ou "encharcado" sempre Óptima aderência - recomendo apesar de caros.
Coloquei 2 Turanza ER300, como são apenas 2 não deu para notar grandes diferenças.
Em Fevereiro de 2010 coloquei 4 Michelin Primacy HP 2 duraram cerca de 35 000 km 2 ainda estão para durar (esqueci de cruzar, lol)
Seja seco ou "encharcado" sempre Óptima aderência - recomendo apesar de caros.
Coloquei 2 Turanza ER300, como são apenas 2 não deu para notar grandes diferenças.